Arizona S.B. 1070
The Arizona Senate Bill 1070 seeks to capture and deport illegal immigrants from the United States granting police agents the ability to check the immigration status of any individual if there is reasonable suspicion to believe that the person is living illegally in the country.
Supporters of this law say that one should not be suspected simply because of race or nationality, but according to Chris Stanislowski in his article “Arizona’s New Law: A Call for Reform,” this law simply institutionalizes discrimination and condones racial profiling since “reasonable suspicion” is not clearly defined. The author continues explaining that many U.S. citizens that are Latino or may look as such could be discriminated against under the bill and may be in risk of being treated as citizens of second class in their own country; likewise, legal residents and foreign nationals who are visiting the United States legally may also face unnecessary and unfair harassment.
The Mexican government has suggested not to visit Arizona; people from other states have felt the discrimination and have opted not to visit or move to Arizona. In fact, University of Arizona has reported that some students have decided to leave the institution in protest for the new law. In a similar attempt, many civil rights groups have boycotted the state, the author reports.
Stanislowski’s article states that those who support the law argue that criminal cases are linked to the number of illegal immigrants in the state providing the example of the murder of an Arizona rancher, supposedly by an illegal immigrant. To this respect, the author argues that even though the violence committed by drug traffickers and smugglers is a serious problem, this does not mean that all undocumented people are responsible for these offenses; however, those in favor of the bill blame illegal immigrants for these acts.
The Mexican government has suggested not to visit Arizona; people from other states have felt the discrimination and have opted not to visit or move to Arizona. In fact, University of Arizona has reported that some students have decided to leave the institution in protest for the new law. In a similar attempt, many civil rights groups have boycotted the state, the author reports.
Stanislowski’s article states that those who support the law argue that criminal cases are linked to the number of illegal immigrants in the state providing the example of the murder of an Arizona rancher, supposedly by an illegal immigrant. To this respect, the author argues that even though the violence committed by drug traffickers and smugglers is a serious problem, this does not mean that all undocumented people are responsible for these offenses; however, those in favor of the bill blame illegal immigrants for these acts.
President Obama’s administration argues that the law interferes with long established federal authority regarding immigration and could result in unfair harassment of citizens and legal immigrants.
S.B. 1070
ARIZONA-- April 23, 2010 Senate Bill 1070 was signed by Governor Jan Brewer. It’s been a little over a year, and it seems the controversy surrounding the bill is slowly deteriorating. It seems, however, the action preceding the passing is still highly active. Has it helped immigration laws or is it causing racial profiling and stereotyping? The answers are still mixed throughout all levels of society.
Obviously Governor Brewer’s stance is highly defended. It’s reported that “over 3.7 million dollars in donations have been collected”[1] by her office. There are, however, citizens and organizations trying to counter her actions, including the U.S. Department of Justice. The U.S. government sued Arizona’s law, resulting in a countersuit by Arizona in February 2011. In the countersuit, “Arizona claims that the federal government has violated the U.S. Constitution by failing to enforce immigration laws”[2]. Naturally, it would seem Arizona may have used extreme measures to get some type of response from the government. Well, Arizona received the attention they sought, but it may not be the attention they needed.
The aftermath of the bill has been well documented on the federal and state level but what about the citizens effected? Jorge-Mario Cabrera, a communications and public relations Director remembers the day the bill was passed: “By mid-day, thousands of young people had walked out of their school sanctums towards Arizona's State Capitol Building”[3]. He fears citizens of Arizona will be in a “battlefield where loved ones, their parents in particular, could be criminalized, displaced, uprooted with the stroke of a demagogue's pen”. The effects of S.B. 1070 have been showcased throughout national and local news and is effectively sending a ripple effect throughout the country. Other states are using it as a model to follow; “copycat laws” are in production in states like Utah, Georgia and Florida. It seems states may be acting without hesitation because of the lack of federal aid for immigration issues. Can the government solve the problems or will states attempt to come up with more short term solutions?